A couple of weeks I wrote about CBA-itis on the last day of the Ryman League. With 55 goals scored in just 11 games you got the feeling that some teams weren’t taking the final games seriously. In fact even the Ryman League in their normal non-political, neutral tone commented that a few teams were “De-mob happy”. Unfortunately clubs are able to reduce their squads (and thus weekly budget) at will if players are not on a contract. So if you have nothing to play for why would you retain the more expensive players in your squad?
On Wednesday 3rd May Ware finally staged their last game of the season against Waltham Forest in the Ryman League North. The game had been postponed three times since the last Saturday of the season due to a waterlogged pitch as rain continued to lash the south of England. Ware needed to win by three clear goals to avoid relegation. Ilford could only watch on from a distance to see if Waltham Forest, themselves with nothing to play for, could stop Ware winning and then winning by the three goals. The Isthmian League decreed that this game HAD to be played as soon as possible so that the season could be wrapped up (that is another story).
Come kick off time and the visitors could only muster nine players. At that point how do you think Ilford must have thought? They toiled for 42 games, in some instances against the odds, to fulfil their fixtures, yet another team couldn’t even get 11 players on a pitch and as a result there was a good chance they would be relegated. By the end of the game, it ended up 10 v 8 as both teams had a player sent off, although Ware could only score two goals and thus were relegated on goals scored. But what if they had scored a third? What action would be available to Ilford to cry “foul”? Or what would have happened if Waltham Forest would have on purposely got another player sent off to void the game? The official line from the Ryman League was the game was “surreal”. To us it is simply wrong. Continue reading